ATEM東日本支部 第3回東北特別研究会のお知らせ

新しい参加者がお二人加わり、無事に終了しました。

日時:2024年9月7日(土曜日)、13:00 – 17:00

会場:仙台協立第一ビル 5階(5F)map

宮城県仙台市青葉区国分町1丁目 8-13

Date: Saturday, September 7th, 2024, 1:00 PM – 5:00 PM

Place: Sendai Kyoritsu Daiichi Building 5th floor (5F) map

研究会の後に懇親会を予定しております。(事前予約制)

参加ご希望の方は、こちらの懇親会参加フォーム(Google Form)にて申し込みください。[締切 9月3日(火)23:59]

https://forms.gle/uY6esVGCQpG34ysh9

We are planning a social gathering following the study session on the day of the event (reservation required). If you wish to participate, please register in advance using the following participation form.[Deadline: Tuesday, September 3rd, 23:59].

https://forms.gle/uY6esVGCQpG34ysh9

13:00

開会あいさつ

13:10-13:30

“AI Tools in an EGAP Course: The Write Stuff or Cautious Optimism?”

Barry Kavanagh (Tohoku University)

Abstract: This study investigates the potential of AI-based paraphrasing tools in enhancing first-year students’ EGAP (English for General Academic Purposes) skills at a national university in Japan. Seventy students participated in class units focused on paraphrasing and summarizing techniques. Initially, they were tasked with summarizing and paraphrasing two reading passages and completing a survey regarding the perceived difficulty of the activity. The following week, the students repeated the same summarizing and paraphrasing tasks, this time with the assistance of an AI-based paraphrasing tool, followed by a similar survey that included additional questions about their perceptions of the AI tool. The students’ writing, with and without AI tool support, was evaluated for grammar accuracy, clarity, and readability, using Flesch reading-ease scores assessed by an AI writing assistant. Surveys revealed that students found it challenging to change the word order or structure of the original text when paraphrasing on their own, but this largely disappeared when AI paraphrasing technology was used. The primary difficulty encountered with the AI tool was editing the paraphrased output provided by the software. Although the AI tool improved the grammatical accuracy of the student’s writing, it did not enhance readability; readability scores declined as assessed by the AI writing assistant.

<Q&A 13:30-13:40>

13:45-14:05

「英会話学習に、学習効果の高い学習者と指導者との双方向性(Interaction)を実現するために」

大月敦子(専修大学) 

概要:国際化の流れと共に実用英語の必要性がこれまで以上に求められている今日、人々の間では特に英会話力を身につけたいという想いが高まっている。自動翻訳機やAIが普及する一方で、人と人との交流も必要だと考えているからだろう。それを物語るように、ネット上には様々な英会話練習ツールが溢れている。そこで本発表では、ネット上での英会話練習法の現況について触れながら、第二言語習得の立場から”インタラクション仮説(Interaction Hypothesis)” Michael. H. Long(1981・1996)の双方向性の英会話授業実践への適用可能性について論じる。次に、英会話授業における学習者と指導者との双方向性のある授業のありかたと学習効果について、フロアーの方々と発表者と一緒に双方向的に議論を進めたい。

<Q&A 14:05-14:15>

14:20-15:00

「定型表現学習のためのYouTube教材作成ワークショップ」

中村佐知子(東北大学)

概要:英語教育における定型表現学習の意義については、長年にわたり十分論じられてこなかったが、近年、その重要性が指摘されている(金澤, 2020; 中田, 2022)。これに伴い、定型表現学習のための教材の研究開発も必要である。当ワークショップでは、定型表現学習のためのYouTube教材の作成方法を実演解説する。動画教材を使用することで、テキストと音声をひとつのインターフェイスで学習することができる。また、「テキストを読む」「音声を聞く」ためだけの教材ではなく、英文を記憶しリピート練習することで、定型表現を受動語彙としてのみではなく能動語彙として使用できることも目指す教材とした。使用するツールは以下のとおりである。基本的にすべて無料で利用できる。

ChatGPT https://openai.com/chatgpt/

Ryan Spring’s Website https://sites.google.com/view/ryanspring/home

音読さん https://ondoku3.com/en/

Audacity https://www.audacityteam.org/

DaVinci Resolve https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/jp/products/davinciresolve

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/

<Q&A 15:00-15:10>

〈15:10-15:30  Coffee Break〉

15:30-15:50

”Building Future-Ready Skills through Video-Based Learning”

Manami Sato (Kyoto University of Advanced Science)

Abstract: In today’s rapidly changing world, it is crucial for college students to develop flexible thinking and perspectives. The OECD Education 2030 framework highlights three transformative competencies: creating new value, reconciling tensions and dilemmas, and taking responsibility. These principles, influenced by the OECD Tohoku School Project (2012 – 2014), have also shaped the national curriculum for OECD countries. This presentation explores the integration of 21st -century skills through the use of video materials, focusing on critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making, into language education. Using Pearson’s Contemporary Topics 1, whose materials feature lecture videos, as the main textbook, the author demonstrates how these competencies can be effectively taught in English classrooms. The presentation will showcase specific classroom activities, including: 1) a gratitude visit (Seligman et al., 2005); 2) win-win negotiations (Covey, 1988); 3) design thinking (Rowe, 1987); and 4) utilitarianism (Mill, 1861). These activities aim to foster a sense of ownership and a sense of responsibility among students and encourage them to take concrete actions as engaged citizens. By incorporating these themes into English education, students not only enhance their language skills, but also develop as proactive members of society, ready to face the challenge of the 21st century.

<Q&A 15:50-16:00>

16:05-16:25

”What should I research? New and hot topics in teaching English through Multimedia”

Ryan Spring (Tohoku University)

Abstract: Many young researchers and new teachers have difficulty finding areas to research or finding new topics to expand into. As technology progresses and using multimedia in TESOL teaching has become increasingly commonplace, some may wonder what sorts of topics there are left to research. However, in looking at the Association of Teaching English through Multimedia (ATEM) and the changes it has undergone many changes in the past decade, including changing the name from “through Movies” to “through Multimedia,” I feel there several new and exciting possibilities in this field that are currently understudied or not examined in enough detail. Drawing on the rich history of ATEM, which conducts research from cultural, linguistic, and educational perspectives, I outline some of the potential research areas that I see as being increasingly important in the future. I also provide some suggestions on new methods to research the topics and potential pitfalls. Specifically, I suggest that in the area of culture, research could be conducted into the differences in originals and remakes and how the global market has influenced Hollywood, in the area of linguistics, research could examine linguistic change via multimedia and be linked more specifically to SLA, and in the area of education, more work could be done on innovative uses of multimedia and the amount of impact it has on learning outcomes and the use of video materials in testing.

<Q&A 16:25-16:35>

16:40

閉会あいさつ

A call to research hot new topics within ATEM’s scope

The Association of Teaching English through Multimedia (ATEM) has undergone many changes in the past decade, including changing the name from “through Movies” to “through Multimedia.” These changes are indicative of the changing times and evolving teaching landscape. With this, I have noticed several emerging research topics that I think our members can, and should, look into, but that not many of us seem to be picking up. In this post, I would like to encourage some members to go after some of these new and exciting areas, explaining what they are and why I feel they are important. In no particular order:

<Culture / Literature Related>

1. Comparative culture studies between originals and remakes

While I have seen ATEM members teach about culture through films and other sorts of media, I still see many papers that use a rather old lens to look at more modern cinema. Recently, Hollywood has been producing ever more remakes of and sequels to earlier films (e.g., Disney keeps making real-life remakes of their animated classics, and it seems that every movie popular in the 80s and 90s is getting a sequel or remake that no one asked for). Though the motivation for this is likely profit driven, at least in part, remakes and sequels offer a chance to compare the atmosphere and culture in the country from the original to the remake. While I have seen some of our members notice this, they often stop short at looking at the similarities rather than pointing out the glaring differences and what those implicate about the change in society.

2. Observing the cultural influence of the global market on Hollywood and digital media

Since Hollywood movies gain so much attention, it is not surprising that they are analyzed and used in English teaching as much as they are. One lens from which movies have often been analyzed is as good glimpse into public thought or general ideas of the time of the culture which produced the film. For example, when a county experiences periods of financial or social unease, horror or monster films often become popular (e.g., the German monster films of the 1920s, the Japanese kaiju films of the 1950s and 60s, etc.; Reimer & Reimer, 1992). However, in more recent times, Hollywood films are often changed drastically in order to appeal to a global audience, as opposed to an American one. With this in mind, do Hollywood movies really reflect American ideas and public thought anymore? Furthermore, as the country becomes increasingly divided since the early 2010s, do any films truly represent general though in America anymore?

<Education Related>

3. Innovative uses of multimedia in the English classroom

While ATEM originally focused on just the use of movies in the classroom, there are increasing chances for students to engage with a range of multimedia, and I would encourage more studies on this. Specifically, there is still much room to focus on student-created multimedia as a means of learning (e.g., Spring, 2020a), uses of short video clips presented through streaming platforms (e.g., Ramsden, 2020), and manipulations of text, videos, images, and music to create more interactive experiences (e.g. Nakamura et al., 2024). Now that ATEM focuses on a range of multimedia and it is becoming ever-easier to implement media usage both in the classroom and at home as part of extra studying or flipped-learning, more study will be needed in these areas as well. For example, some burning questions that do not have definitive answers include: Should subtitles be used or not? Does it depend on the level? Should students slow down videos if they find them too fast, or re-watch? Are listening activities better as videos? If so, does it matter what is shown in the video? For example, if students are listening to a lecture about turtles, is it better to have no video, video of a lecturer, video of turtles, or images and text? Do certain patterns promote learning or become a crutch? If we use videos outside of the classroom as part of flipped-learning, how do we ensure that students watch them? How do we turn video watching into a more interactive activity? All of these areas need ever more exploring and the results should eventually be amalgamated via meta-analyses and scoping reviews.

4. Focusing on differences in improvement when teaching English through multimedia

As teachers, our own students often become our participants, making our research quasi-experimental. One common way to test if a method is working is to use pre-/post-testing with a control and experimental group. However, if a teacher truly believes one method to be inferior, is it ethical to give one group of students a worse class to see if it is truly worse? Furthermore, how do we keep research bias out of the results in this case? More importantly, whether or not scores increase on average, there is always variance in how much students improve. I believe a more important question to try to answer when conducting educational studies is why some students improve more than others. By investigating this question instead, we can also see how valid our teaching methods are and what areas we need to improve. This sort of study can be conducted with pre- and post-tests and either regression analyses (e.g., Spring & Takeda, 2024) or repeated ANOVA with covariates (e.g., Spring, 2020b), or even by looking for common themes between our top and bottom improvers (e.g., Spring et al., 2019). If conducting regression analyses, it is a good idea to use the delta scores (post-test minus pre-test) as the dependent variable and include pre-test scores as a means of counteracting the effect of previous knowledge. Furthermore, when conducting these analyses, consider using dominance analysis for best results (Mizumoto, 2023). You can find free tools for doing this here or here: <Mizumoto Tool>, <Spring Tool>

5. The use of video materials as part of testing

Recently, some studies have suggested that using videos to test listening comprehension may be superior to using audio files alone (e.g., Kim, 2023; Suvarov, 2015). Part of the rationale is that video tests are more authentic (when do we close our eyes when talking to others?), and part of the rationale is that the videos provide more context via their visual cues, which ensures that we are testing listening ability and not the ability to conjecture what situation two speakers are in from audio clues alone. This areas is both extremely understudied, but also well within the scope of ATEM.

<Linguistics Related>

6. Checking for linguistic change in spoken English

Thanks to the movie corpus (Davies, 2019), it is easier than ever to conduct corpus studies on linguistic elements and match these to dates when they emerge and how frequent they are in particular decades. As should be apparent to any linguist, language is always changing and evolving. As movies tend to be a good gauge for commonly known and understood spoken registers, they can also be used to track changes in the English language. Not only is this good for finding out the latest trends in slang and new expressions, but it can also help us to know when certain expressions and turns of phrase have begun to fade away. A good example is of the past tense of the verb “dream” in American English. While both “dreamt” and “dreamed” were both quite common up until the 1950s, the former began to fall out of usage, and is rarely used in recent times. However, I’m sure this is not the only change, as I often notice differences in my own vernacular and that of my parents and older generations.

7. Linking linguistic examples to SLA

Many linguistics papers have been published in the ATEM journal that apply theory to actual examples found in visual media, such as movies. However, more work is still required to point out the benefits of teaching these discoveries from a second language acquisition (SLA). For example, it could prove beneficial to find examples of theoretically difficult to parse syntactic or semantic structures from film and visual media and then test how well students are able to understand these expressions when presented with them. While we often assume that students have some syntactic or semantic knowledge, SLA studies that test students’ ability to parse or understand such structures do not always produce results congruent with our assumptions. This is especially true in the context of visual media, as the various context clues from the visual media may actually provide students with the extra information required for them to understand the supposedly difficult structures. Therefore, I believe work is warranted as to which are difficult to understand both with and without visual media, what the differences in these types are. This may help further our understanding of the types of visual media that we need to use to help students understand linguistically difficult structures more easily. This potentially overlaps with suggestion (5).

It is my hope that by suggesting some of these potential topics and tools, ATEM members can potentially branch out into new topics or use their pre-existing knowledge to help solve some of these mysteries. I also encourage new, young researchers to pick up some of these topics and areas, and potentially reach out to me or other, more senior ATEM members for help. There are a lot of possibilities and potential in our field, and yet, much of it remains unexplored. I implore the next generation or researchers and educators to begin looking into these topics, and the current and older generations of researchers and educators to help the next generations to develop the skills to research these topics in depth and present their results so that we may all benefit from their findings.

References and Suggested Readings

Davies, M. (2019) The Movie Corpus. Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/movies/.

Kim, J. (2023, September 15). Test takers’ interaction with context videos in a video-based listening test: A conceptual replication and extension of Suvorov (2015). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/r83by

Nakamura, S., Spring, R, & Sakurai, S. (2024) The impact of ASR-based interactive video activities on speaking skills: Japanese EFL learners’ perceptions. TESL-EJ, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27108a5

Ramsden, T. (2020). Jiritsuteki gakushu o unagasu jugyogai gakushu no kokoromi: YouTube bideo report [An attempt at encouraging autonomous study outside of the classroom: YouTube video reports]. ATEM Journal, 25, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.24499/atemnew.25.0_17

Reimer, R., & Reimer, C. (1992) Nazi-retro film: How German narrative cinema remembers the past. Twayne.

Mizumoto, A. (2023). Calculating the relative importance of multiple regression predictor variables using dominance analysis and random forests. Language Learning, 73(1), 161–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12518

Spring, R. (2020a). Can Video-creation Project Work Affect Students’ Oral Proficiency? An Analysis of Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy. TESL-EJ, 24(2). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume24/ej94/ej94a1/

Spring, R. (2020b). Maximizing the benefits of video-creation PBLL in the EFL classroom: A preliminary analysis of factors associated with improvement in oral proficiency. STEM Journal, 21(4), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2020.21.4.107

Spring, R., & Takeda, J. (2024). Teaching phrasal verbs and idiomatic expressions through multimodal flashcards. STEM Journal, 25(2), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2024.25.2.40

Spring, R., Kato, F., & Mori, C. (2019). Factors associated with improvement in oral fluency when using Video-Synchronous Mediated Communication with native speakers: An analysis of 3 years of data from a Skype partner program. Foreign Language Annals, 52(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12381

Suvorov, R. (2015). The use of eye tracking in research on video-based second language (L2) listening assessment: A comparison of context videos and content videos. Language Testing, 32(4), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214562099